Discovery Dashboard
"We're not making up rules. We're checking your script against the same blueprint that Whiplash, Get Out, and The Dark Knight all follow — whether their writers knew it or not."
"Not: 'Your Act Two midpoint lacks thematic resonance.' But: 'Around page 55, three scenes in a row show your main character hesitating without anything new happening. Here's how to fix it.'"
"Tap Creative Choice on anything intentional. SceneOne logs it, respects it, and never raises it again. Your score won't drop for it — we don't penalize deliberate decisions."
"Think of it like tracked changes — but the AI reads your revision immediately and tells you if it worked."
"Upload the same script again and you get your results instantly — we remember it. You'll never wait the full time twice."
"Writers submit. SceneOne grades. You browse what's ready. The filter happens before you ever open a file."
"You never see the actual script until the writer approves your access request. Logline and DNA are always visible. The script itself stays protected."
"Writers see your credential card before they decide — your name, company, role, and IMDb. That's what gets you approved. Make sure your profile is complete."
"Writers built their scripts here trusting that the industry readers are real. Your verified status is what makes that trust possible. Don't abuse it."
Act One break lands on page 15 — character-driven and plot-essential simultaneously.
p.15Midpoint (p.55) resets the protagonist's goal rather than raising stakes.
p.55At p.55, have the antagonist take something that makes the original plan physically impossible — force reinvention, not reconsideration.
Internal conflict between ambition and loyalty is present and felt. The mentor relationship creates genuine tension.
pp.20–80The antagonist is reactive, not active. Compelling villains pursue goals that exist independently of the hero.
pp.30–70Give Marcus one scene in early Act 2 where we see him pursuing his goal without Sarah present. Stakes become real when the villain doesn't need the hero to have a plan.
The exchange on p.62 — the argument is never about what the characters say it's about. Subtext does all the work.
p.62Character voices clearly differentiated. Sarah speaks in incomplete sentences under pressure; Marcus always completes his thoughts.
ThroughoutAct One moves at exactly the right pace — setup, stakes, and disruption land efficiently.
pp.1–25Pages 34–51 lose momentum. Three consecutive scenes establish the same beat — protagonist hesitation — without escalating.
pp.34–51Collapse scenes 4, 5, and 6 into one strong scene that shows hesitation AND forces a decision. The reader doesn't need to see Sarah doubt three times. They need to see her choose once.
The recurring empty chair — opening and closing — works as genuine visual callback without announcing itself.
pp.1, 94Several scenes rely on dialogue to convey emotional state when action could do the same work.
pp.28, 44, 67On p.28 show her checking the lock twice instead of saying she's scared. On p.44 show her touching the watch instead of mentioning her father. Let objects carry emotion.
Upload your next draft and SceneOne will compare scores, log what changed, and show you if the work landed.
Approving gives read-only access for 14 days — no rights transfer. No response within 72 hours = auto-decline.